Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 1 de 1
Filter
Add filters








Language
Year range
1.
Alexandria Medical Journal [The]. 2003; 45 (3): 133-162
in English | IMEMR | ID: emr-61399

ABSTRACT

To study the effectiveness of microsurgical testicular sperm extraction in non-obstructive azoospermia. Testicular sperm extraction [TESE] is well-defined procedure for surgical sperm retrieval in obstructive and non-obstructive azoospermia. This study was focused on the evaluation of the effectiveness of microsurgical testicular sperm extraction [TESE] in intracytoplasmic sperm injection [ICSI] for non-obstructive azoospermia. Material and Forty-two [42] male patients were included in this study. They were classified into 4 groups. Group I: Patients with normal sized tests and normal FSH, with previous diagnostic biopsy [10 patients]. Group II: Patients with normal sized tests and normal FSH, with previous conventional TESE [10 patients]. Group III: Patients with small sized tests and high FSH, and without previous testicular biopsy [20 patients]. Group IV: Patients with kleinfelter's syndrome [2 patients]. Microsurgical TESE was compared with conventional TESE as regard sperm recovery rate and complications were assessed by ultrasonographic and endocrinological methods. Microsurgical technique could extract sperm in 7 patients [70%] of group 1, 6 patients [60%] of group II and in in 5 patients [50%] of group III. It also succeded to extract sperm in group IV [kleinfelter's syndrome]. The sperm retrieval rate by microdissection TESE [60%] appeared higher than by conventional TESE [40%]. However, this observation failed to reach statistical significance. Microsurgical TESE could retrieve sperm in 100% of patients with hypospermatogenesis while conventional TESE retrieved sperm in 87.5%. Microsurgical TESE could retrieve sperm in 58.3% of patients with Sertoli only syndrome while conventional TESE retrieved sperm in only 8.3%. This was statistically significant [p < 0.05]. Microsurgical TESE could retrieve sperm in 20% of patients with maturation arrest while non-microsurgical TESE retrieved sperm in 40%. The complication rate was indifferent between microdissection and conventionol TESE. Microsurgical testicular sperm extraction is an ideal methodss for harvesting the sperm specially in difficult cases [small sized tests, cases of failed previous diagnostic biopsy or conventional TESE, repeated TESE, and in Kleinfelter's syndrome]. It allows selection of seminiferous tubules more likely to contain sperm specially in Sertoli only syndrome and Kleinfelter's syndrome. It also allows identification and avoidance of tessticular vessels, minimizing complications


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Sperm Transport , Testis , Microsurgery/complications , Sperm Injections, Intracytoplasmic , Follicle Stimulating Hormone , Biopsy , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL